Nutrition discussion

Rubric for a 60 Point Discussion Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement Initial post Content/Comprehension 20 points possible Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail 20-15 points Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited 14-10 pointsdiv style #button { background-color: #F05A1A; border: 5px; border-radius: 5px; color: white; padding: 5px 5px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; font-size: 13px; margin: 4px 2px; cursor: pointer; } /style div class=’alert alert-success’ h3Save your time – order a paper!/h3 p style=’font-size: 16px;’Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines a href=’/order’ id=’button’Order Paper Now/a /div/div Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed 9-0 points Initial Post Timeliness 5 points possible Submits initial post by deadline 5 points Submits initial post one to three days late 3 points Initial Post Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics 5 points possible Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required 5-4points Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors 3-2 points Posts have 3 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required 1-0 points Peer Responses Engagement/Classroom Interaction 20 points possible (One to two response posts, please refer to the week’s discussion for specific requirements) Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail 20-15 points Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail 14-10 points Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail 9-0 points Peer Responses Timeliness 5 points possible Submits peer response posts by deadline 5 points Submits peer response posts late 0 points Peer Responses Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics 5 points possible Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required 5-4 points Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors 3-2 points Posts have 3 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required 1-0 points